If you're not familiar with the concept, it basically means that property owners can build another potentially stand-alone structure on their property that opens up to the lane - what we would otherwise call an alley. You can check out this fact-sheet from the City of Vancouver for more info.
Rob brings up some really interesting questions as to what LWH will do to Vancouver:
Will it reduce or increase the price of lots? I'm sure we'll see arguments both ways (and I've heard the argument coming from sellers that it will increase the value). Because it applies to a large number of lots its clear that it will be a city wide change. The house at 2625 Oxford doesn't have a new competitive advantage over its neighbour across the street. It will make it easier to generate income off properties. What will a nice, new laneway house rent for? What will it net? What kind of mortgage will that carry, and what will construction costs be? I think its safe to say that LWH will contribute to positive cash flow. Existing owners will enjoy the benefit of the change. Future buyers will find the benefit priced into the purchase price. Is there a downside? Will laneway housing improve, for example, East Van neighbourhoods or will it turn out to be a new way to supply sub-standard accomodation? Could it be a solution to homelessness? Is there a fit between privately owned LWH, Strathcona, and government funded social services? (How's that for a hand grenade!)A laneway house in Toronto. Photos from Canadian Architect
Personally, I'm interested in the concept as there seems to be some sort of environmental requirements that need to be met in order to build, along with the obvious fact that Vancouver is desperately in need of more rental housing. And, according to the fact-sheet, renovations or upgrades to the Laneway House do not need to coincide with upgrades to the main unit - handy, for property owners I can imagine.
Vancouver will always need to use it's land in the most efficient way possible, however, I'm also curious if this move may further increase the divide between property owners and non-property owners in Vancouver. Or, will we see rates lower as more units are made available, along with a decrease in value for those properties that do not enter onto a lane?
I'm no real estate expert, but I'm sure there will be consequences to this decision. What do you think: Good or bad decision?
For more info (and comments), head to Rob's article which includes a few more links to other opinion sources such as the Straight.